If the F1 rule book were ever to be published, it would be a gigantic volume, as it ought to be. Rules governing ride heights, wing dimensions, engine capacity and so forth are, of course, necessary and even the layman with no understanding of the technical side (like myself) accepts this.
But what alienates fans is needless tweaking with the sporting regulations. Some of us already get misty eyed thinking about the days when qualifying was about going and setting the fastest lap, without all this fuel burning and knockout rounds. And what about when a team was able to choose the best tyres for the race and not have to also race with a deliberately inferior tyre for one stint in order to create a contrived ‘interest’ in tyres that is frankly irrelevant?
Now there are rumours going around that teams will be exempt from penalty for the first engine change of the year - as long as the engine failure takes place in a month with an ‘a’ in the name and the driver has had porridge for breakfast. Or something like that. OK, I made the last bit of that up, but I don’t envy the job of F1 commentators and writers explaining to their viewers and readers why Massa will be demoted ten places this race because it is his second engine failure of the year but Kovalainen won’t be punished because it’s his first engine change of the year. Who is going to keep track of such matters and who, quite frankly, is going to care?
Casual F1 fans, the ones who jump on board when a driver from their country starts doing well, is not going to get hooked on the sport by such arbitrary decrees from the powers that be.
- Also on F1 News: F1 News: Jenson Button says “Remember me…?”
- Elsewhere on the web: 2008 F1 rule changes